Friday, Apr. 24, 2015 - 10:47 p.m.
Legal Pot- so what?
********************
my true opinion is as follows
Pot = money and fear
it basically is self generated welfare
for thousands of otherwise non productive people
who directly tax the working class
for the privilege of getting mushy headed
selling them weed
its an interesting market
that works on its own
the cops can read it everyday
by putting on jeans and shopping in bars,
grow shops
and schoolyards
I am sure legislators laugh at the sheer cheek
of walk in pot stores
and be sure each one has been visited
by detectives who spell out
the unwritten rules
because cops run the whole pot racket from above
the little pot snots manage
to feed themselves
on the scraps
well fine
who cares
I learned in Ottawa from frank discussions
with you know who
that keeping pot illegal
is the easiest containment approach
& by far- and govt has explored
every model you could possibly imagine
-- if pot creates a cancer source, well Ok - its illegal- not their problem
if pot does destroy brains well ok its illegal- its not their problem
if pot is nothing. just spearmint or basil-- let the guy off for procession but nail him for trafficking if he gets too big
its not their problem
they don't want pot to be their problem
and I don't blame them
Letting the pot market create its own climate gravity
heritage and moral code is completely acceptable
it is a fringe society pastime- at best- at best
pot did not change the world
the world changed pot
anyone who wants to join the tax rolls can
but they will have to hide their pot use
and piss in a cup
for their certificate of straightness
Insurance builds its own walls
the feds just shrug
insurance calls more shots than morality or law
they call all the compliance shots for practical life
no appeal will ever happen
pot is an unacceptable risk to obtain coverage
no govt can change that requirement
and it will stay that way until such time
as the Insurance people change their risk assessment
even if a roadside THC test appears
its still up to the insurance people to accept it
and right now 0.00 % is their benchmark
a thc test would only make more people ineligible to drive
be glad the thc test scene has frozen at 1999 technology
if Govt really wanted a digital saliva breath thc tester
it would exist-- but they don't want the responsibility
all cops and insurance have to do now is prove SOME level of thc to get a bingo call
not a ceiling level of safety or danger or any of that service to humanity stuff
just showing any amount of a controlled substance does their job of enforcement
next sucker-- step right up
